The capital cost of a traction winch is the part buyers evaluate, and it is rarely the part that decides the economics. Setup and re-rig time per corridor dominates, and on short or awkward corridors it can consume a large share of the shift before any timber moves.
Rope is the second recurring cost, and it is safety-critical rather than merely consumable. Establish inspection intervals, replacement criteria and cost before purchase, and treat rope as a running expense in the model rather than a periodic surprise.
The third cost is the anchor machine. Where a second machine is tied up anchoring, its own utilisation has to be accounted for in the system economics — the winch has not made that machine free, it has redeployed it. On small operations this is frequently the difference between a system that pays and one that does not.
Against those costs sit the benefits: mechanising terrain that previously required manual falling, improved machine stability, access to stands that could not otherwise be harvested economically, greater operator protection, and higher utilisation of expensive machines that would otherwise be idle when steep coupes come up in the schedule. Model slope hours per year net of setup, and compare honestly against subcontracting the steep portion.