Skip to content

Attachments

Harvester heads

A machine in its own right — and the single most important specification decision in CTL.

5 benchmark machines9 buying criteria4 buying traps

A commercial harvesting head should be considered a machine in its own right. It contains a considerable percentage of the technology responsible for actual production: gripping, felling, feeding, delimbing, diameter measurement, length measurement, bucking, top sawing, colour marking, multi-tree handling and debarking.

The most common and most expensive specification error in Australian forestry is confusing three different numbers: the optimum DBH range, the recommended maximum regular DBH, and the absolute maximum cutting capacity. Manufacturers publish all three. Buyers routinely quote only the third.

What it does

  • Grips and fells the stem
  • Feeds the stem through the delimbing knives at up to 5-7 m/s
  • Measures diameter and length continuously
  • Bucks logs to assortment under computer optimisation
  • Handles multiple small stems in one cycle where configured
  • Debarks, where eucalyptus rollers and configurations are fitted

Who profitably buys one

  • CTL harvesting contractors matching a head to a purpose-built carrier
  • Excavator-based processing contractors at the landing
  • Eucalyptus plantation contractors requiring debarking
  • Contractors converting an existing 20-30 t excavator into a processor

Market context

The harvester heads market in Australia

The head is where most of a cut-to-length system's technology, most of its production and most of its downtime live. Treating it as an accessory to the carrier is the most expensive habit in this market.

Australia buys heads for two quite different jobs. One is the purpose-built CTL carrier, where head and machine are matched by the manufacturer. The other — far more common among medium contractors — is the excavator conversion, where a 20-30 tonne machine already in the fleet becomes a landing processor. The second route carries lower capital and broader resale, and it is why excavator-class heads are so well represented here.

Eucalyptus is the local complication. Roller configuration, debarking capability, feed force and structural durability all differ from softwood requirements, and manufacturers publish eucalyptus configurations precisely because the standard build does not transfer.

Published specifications

Benchmark machines in the Australian market

Indicative published manufacturer and distributor figures. Confirm every specification, lift chart and hydraulic requirement with the manufacturer or authorised dealer before purchase.

The heavy processor-head category, positioned for demanding hardwood and softwood harvesting and processing.

Head weight3,560 kg
Recommended carrier27 t and above
Maximum butt-saw capacity815 mm
Maximum delimbing opening710 mm
Maximum feed-roller opening875 mm
Feed speedup to 5.2 m/s
Pump requirement320-360 L/min
Hydraulic pressureup to 35 MPa

The clearest published illustration of why optimum diameter, not maximum diameter, is the number that matters.

Weight~1,480 kg
Minimum pump capacity200 L/min
Recommended working pressure26-30 MPa
Feed roller opening630 mm
Feed force~38 kN
Standard cutting diameter700 mm
Optional cutting systemup to ~810 mm
Feed speedup to ~7 m/s
Highest-productivity DBH range~160-510 mm

The heavier end of the SP range, positioned for heavy softwood, crooked hardwood and demanding processing.

Standard published weight~1,792 kg
Minimum pump capacity250 L/min
Feed force45 kN
Cutting capacity800 mm
Feed opening~700 mm
Recommended optimum DBH~250-500 mm depending on configuration

An excavator-class harvesting head for roughly 21-25 tonne carriers, with eucalyptus roller configurations available.

Weight~1,342 kg
Maximum cut~710 mm
Maximum feed force31.3 kN
Maximum feed speed5 m/s
Flow200-330 L/min
Excavator class~21-25 t

The heavier Log Max head for roughly 25-30 tonne carriers, again with eucalyptus roller options.

Weight~1,897 kg
Maximum cut~800 mm
Maximum feed force45 kN
Maximum feed speed5.2 m/s
Flow250-350 L/min
Excavator class~25-30 t

Read the specification

What the published numbers actually say

Published maximum cutting capacity versus published optimum production range

The bar is what the head can cut. The darker band is where the manufacturer says it is most productive. Where no band is shown, no optimum range is published — ask for it.

  • Maximum cutting capacity
  • Stated highest-productivity range
0200400600800stem diameter (mm)SP MaskinerSP 661 LF700SP MaskinerSP 761 LF800Log Max6000V710optimum not publishedLog Max7000XT800optimum not publishedWaratahHTH624C 4x4815optimum not publishedMaximum cut compared with stated optimum production range for each head.

Model pages

Specific machines in this class

Full published specifications, commercial fit, and what to verify before signing — for each machine.

Side by side

Comparison

Log Max 6000V vs 7000XT — what going one class heavier actually costs
SpecificationLog Max 6000VLog Max 7000XT
Weight~1,342 kg~1,897 kg
Maximum cut~710 mm~800 mm
Maximum feed force31.3 kN45 kN
Maximum feed speed5 m/s5.2 m/s
Flow200-330 L/min250-350 L/min
Excavator class~21-25 t~25-30 t

Measurement

How this machine should be judged

These are the numbers that determine whether the purchase works. Specification sheets rarely contain any of them.

Cubic metres per productive hour in your DBH class
Head productivity is a curve against diameter, not a single number.
Measuring accuracy against mill reconciliation
A persistent 2% length error on 100,000 m³ is a very large number.
Head availability
Head downtime typically dominates CTL system downtime.
Consumable cost per cubic metre
Chain, bar, rollers and knives, normalised to production.

Before you request quotes

Buying criteria

Assemble every one of these before contacting a supplier. Any line you cannot answer is where your commercial risk sits.

  • Optimum DBH range — ask for it in writing
  • Recommended maximum regular DBH
  • Absolute maximum cutting capacity
  • Continuous flow required, and pressure at that flow
  • Head weight against the carrier's lift chart at working reach
  • Species configuration — eucalyptus rollers, debarking, delimbing knife geometry
  • Multi-tree handling capability if thinning small stems
  • Measuring system, calibration process and StanForD output
  • Local availability of feed motors, saw motors and valve blocks

What goes wrong

Buying traps

Each of these is a documented pattern, not a hypothetical.

Ownership

Consumables and wear items

Cost drivers

  • Saw chain and bar
  • Feed rollers
  • Delimbing knives
  • Measuring wheel
  • Hose kits
  • Feed motor and saw motor rebuilds

Price these before signing

  • Chain
  • Bar
  • Sprocket
  • Measuring wheel
  • Feed roller
  • Delimbing knife
  • Hose kit

Obtain consumable prices at quotation stage and model annual expenditure. Use the dealer quote checklist.

Used purchase

Inspection sequence

Hours alone are not enough. Work through this in order.

  1. 1Head frame for cracking and repair welds
  2. 2Feed motors and feed rollers
  3. 3Arm pins, bushes and cylinders
  4. 4Saw motor, bar mount and chain tension system
  5. 5Delimbing knives and diameter sensors
  6. 6Measuring wheel and wiring harness
  7. 7Valve block and rotator play
  8. 8Ask: head hours, feed motor rebuild date, saw motor replacement date, last pin and bush change

What it actually costs

Cost structure and the variables that move it

Purchase price is the smallest part of most forestry equipment decisions. These are the variables that decide what the machine costs per unit of saleable production.

Head economics are driven by consumables and by matching, not by purchase price. A head that is one class too large costs you boom payload, agility and transport weight on every cycle for its whole life, in exchange for capacity used occasionally.

The specification error that costs most money is diameter. Manufacturers publish three separate numbers — optimum production range, recommended maximum regular DBH, and absolute maximum cutting capacity — and buyers routinely quote only the third.

Cost drivers, their effect, and what you can do about them
Cost driverEffect on your economicsHow to control it
Species configurationEucalyptus consumes rollers, knives and chain far faster than radiata pine at the same stem size.Price the consumable set for your species and model it per cubic metre before committing.
Head weight against carrierEvery kilogram of head, rotator and coupler comes off the lift chart before any timber is handled.Check the lift chart at your working radius with the full assembly fitted, not the bare carrier rating.
Continuous hydraulic supplyA head needing 320-360 L/min at 35 MPa is not satisfied by a carrier that peaks there briefly.Obtain continuous flow, pressure at that flow, return pressure and permitted continuous duty.
Measuring system driftCalibration drift silently erodes revenue against mill reconciliation.Establish the calibration regime and audit machine volume against manual measurement periodically.
Feed and saw motor rebuildsMajor periodic costs that dominate head life-cycle spend.On used heads, obtain rebuild dates; on new, confirm local holding of both.

Model these against your own contracted hours rather than accepting a generic hourly rate — the machine cost calculator works the arithmetic with your figures, and the bottleneck analyser shows whether the machine is the constraint at all.

Worked situations

Three buyers, three different right answers

The same machine class suits very different businesses in very different configurations. These are the situations that recur.

1

Excavator conversion for landing processing

The situation
A contractor with a 24-tonne excavator wants to process at the landing rather than subcontract it, in softwood averaging 300 mm.
What usually works
An excavator-class head in the 21-25 tonne bracket, matched to sustained rather than peak flow. The head can later move to a replacement carrier, which protects the investment.
The trade-off
Boom geometry and cooling are not optimised for continuous processing, so production per hour will trail a purpose-built machine.
Ask the supplier
What continuous flow does the excavator sustain at working oil temperature, measured at the coupler?
2

Choosing between two head sizes

The situation
A buyer is weighing a ~1,340 kg head rated to around 710 mm against a ~1,900 kg head rated to around 800 mm, in stands averaging 280 mm with occasional 450 mm stems.
What usually works
The smaller head is almost certainly correct. The dominant stem class sits well inside its range, and the 555 kg difference is carried on every cycle for the life of the machine.
The trade-off
Occasional oversize stems take longer or need a different approach. That is cheaper than paying weight, carrier class and component cost continuously.
Ask the supplier
What is the published optimum production range for each head, as distinct from maximum cut?
3

Eucalyptus processing to a bark specification

The situation
A hardwood operation must meet a mill bark limit, with stems that are heavy, fibrous and irregular.
What usually works
Feed force and debarking performance govern. Eucalyptus roller configuration is not optional, and structural durability matters because the loads are higher than equivalent softwood.
The trade-off
Higher consumable cost per cubic metre, and a configuration less suited to softwood if contract mix changes.
Ask the supplier
What bark result is achieved against this specification, and at what roller and knife cost per cubic metre?

Local conditions

Australian considerations

Specification sheets are written for global markets. These are the factors that change the answer here.

Optimum ranges are published — ask for them

SP Maskiner publishes a highest-productivity DBH range of roughly 160-510 mm for a head that cuts to 700 mm, and roughly 250-500 mm for one cutting to 800 mm. Waratah's application information identifies a recommended operating range well below its 815 mm butt-saw capacity. Those second numbers are the commercial specification.

Eucalyptus rollers and debarking

Log Max lists eucalyptus roller configurations across its excavator-class heads, and Ponsse developed the DH7 specifically for eucalyptus plantation harvesting with debarking as a design priority. If you are processing hardwood, specify the species configuration explicitly.

Heat and continuous duty

A head drawing near-maximum flow for hours in Australian summer conditions is a harder duty cycle than catalogue figures assume. Confirm cooling capacity and permitted continuous duty at 35-40°C ambient.

Warning signs

Red flags in the sales conversation

None of these are proof of a bad supplier. All of them are reasons to keep asking.

  • Only the maximum cutting capacity quoted, with no optimum production range offered
  • "Fits 20 tonne excavators" without naming exact models, boom configuration, coupler and counterweight
  • Flow quoted as a peak figure with no continuous rating
  • No mention of case drain requirement where the head needs one
  • Species configuration not discussed when you have told the supplier you process eucalyptus
  • Head hours unknown or not separated from carrier hours on a used purchase
  • No local holding of feed motors, saw motors or valve blocks

Before you sign

Harvester and processor head buyer checklist

Any line you cannot answer is where your commercial risk sits. Take this to the supplier meeting.

  • Optimum DBH range, recommended maximum regular DBH and absolute maximum cut — all three, in writing
  • Your stand's average and 90th-percentile DBH measured against that optimum band
  • Head weight plus rotator plus coupler, checked against the carrier lift chart at working radius
  • Continuous flow and pressure at the head, after hose and coupler losses
  • Return pressure limit and case drain provision
  • Cooling capacity at sustained full load in summer conditions
  • Species configuration: eucalyptus rollers, debarking, delimbing knife geometry
  • Multi-tree handling capability if thinning
  • Measuring system calibration process and StanForD output
  • Consumable prices: chain, bar, sprocket, measuring wheel, rollers, knives, hose kits
  • Local availability of feed motors, saw motors and valve blocks
  • On used heads: hours, feed motor rebuild date, saw motor replacement date, last pin and bush change

For the full procurement sequence, see the commercial procurement checklist and what a dealer quote should include.

Common questions

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between optimum and maximum diameter on a harvester head?

Maximum cutting capacity is the largest stem the head can sever, occasionally. The optimum production range is the diameter band where the manufacturer states it is most productive. They can differ enormously — a head cutting to 700 mm may have a stated highest-productivity range of roughly 160-510 mm. Specify against the optimum range and your own stand data, because that is where the machine spends its working life.

What size excavator do I need for a harvester head?

Tonnage class alone is not an answer. Ask which exact excavator models the head suits, at what boom configuration, with which coupler and counterweight, and whether the lift chart has been checked with head, rotator and coupler fitted. Then confirm the hydraulics: continuous flow, pressure at that flow, return pressure, case drain, cooling and permitted continuous duty.

Is a bigger harvester head better?

Not automatically. Going one class up buys tree capacity and feed force, but costs head weight, carrier class, effective boom payload, agility, transport weight and component price — all carried continuously. If your dominant stem class sits inside the smaller head's optimum range, the smaller head usually earns more.

Do I need a eucalyptus-specific head?

If you are processing eucalyptus to a mill bark specification, yes — or at minimum a eucalyptus roller configuration. Hardwood loads feed force, rollers, knives and structure very differently from radiata pine, and manufacturers publish species configurations because the standard build does not transfer.

What consumables does a harvester head use, and what do they cost?

Chain, guide bar, sprocket, measuring wheel, feed rollers, delimbing knives and hose kits. Costs vary widely with species and stem size, which is why you should obtain prices at quotation stage and model annual spend per cubic metre rather than accepting a general figure.

How do I inspect a used harvester head?

Check the head frame for cracking and repair welds, the feed motors and rollers, arm pins, bushes and cylinders, saw motor, bar mount and chain tension system, delimbing knives, diameter sensors, measuring wheel, wiring harness, valve block and rotator play. Then ask four questions: how many hours are on the head, when were the feed motors rebuilt, when was the saw motor replaced, and when were pins and bushes last changed.

Can I move a head between carriers?

Often yes, and that portability is part of the commercial case for the excavator route — the head can transfer to a replacement carrier later. Confirm hydraulic compatibility, control system interface and mounting before assuming it, because the electrical and control side is usually the constraint rather than the mechanical fit.

Elsewhere on this site

Where this class comes up

The comparisons, buyer profiles and fleet packages that turn on this machine.

See also

Related machine classes